an image
НПП Центральная лаборатория автоматизации измерений
111250 Москва, Энергетическая улица, д.7, офис 311
(495) 134-03-49
E-mail: Данный адрес e-mail защищен от спам-ботов, Вам необходимо включить Javascript для его просмотра.

Introduction to Criminal law

Criminal law:

Criminal law which is also known as penal law. Thus, it regulates the definition and punishment of offenses that are found to have sufficiently harmful social effects but, in itself, do not impose any moral judgments on an offender or impose sanctions on society to cause harm could damage First of all it stops you from committing crimes. the law of criminal procedure regulates the whole process which includes apprehending, trying suspected offenders, Investigating, and charging. beyond a reasonable doubt, the paradigm case of a crime lies in the proof, that a person has committed the crime and he is guilty of two things. One can easily undertsand the rules related to l1 visa usa and know about the top 10 immigration lawyers in houston by visiting the los mejores abogados de inmigración en texas.

First, the accused must commit an act that is considered criminal by society, or actus reus (guilty act). Second, the victim must have the required malicious intent to do a criminal act, or guilty mind (mens rea). Although, an actus reus is enough for the so-called “strict liability” crimes. The criminal system of the civil law tradition distinguishes between intent (Dolce Directus and Dolce Incident) and negligence in the broadest sense. Negligence does not take any type of criminal responsibility unless a particular crime provides for its punishment.

Its example

There are some examples of crimes that include assault, theft, and fraud. In exceptional circumstances, the defense may apply to specific acts, such as committing murder in self-defense or pleading insanity. The English case of R v Dudley and Stephens in the 19thh century is an example of it, which tested a defense of "necessity". The Mignonette, which was sailing to the Sydney from Southampton, sank. Three crew members including a 17-year-old cabin boy and Richard Parker were stranded on a raft. They were starving and the cabin boy was close to death. Due to extreme hunger, the crew killed and ate the cabin boy.

Somehow the crew luckily survived and was later rescued but put on trial for murder. They made an argument and said that it was mandatory to kill the guy in order to save their own lives. Lord Coleridge expressed extreme disapproval, ruling, "It is ordinarily a duty to protect one's life, but to sacrifice it may be the simplest and highest duty." The man got the punishment of hanging, but the public agreed with the crew members over the thing that they killed the boy to save their own lives. In the end, the Crown commuted his sentence to six months in prison.